Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Birth statistics

Source: Victorian Health Department 2009
I expect readers will find the trend in the number of women achieving planned home birth (Table 33)  interesting.  (click on picture to enlarge)

To access the full Victorian Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality & Morbidity (CCOPMM) Annual Report for the year 2009, click here.
[This is the most recent of the annual reports]

Midwives are the only professionals who attend women for planned home birth these days.  In years past there were a few GPs, but time and cost of insurance has caught up with them.  Midwives are attending homebirths privately without professional indemnity insurance, under a special exemption that is in place until June 2015.


I note:
  • the gradual increase in homebirths as a percentage of all confinements*, from 0.2 in 1985, to 0.4 in 2009 (Table 33).
  • Table 34 indicates the type of birth for all women who were recorded at the onset of labour as 'planned' homebirth.  Women planning homebirth in 2009 had 90% 'unassisted vaginal' birth (the overwhelming majority of these being spontaneous, unmedicated); 6% caesarean birth, and the rest forceps, vacuum, or unknown.  
  • This compares with only 38.6% of all women in 2009 coming into spontaneous labour without augmentation (same report, p61), and 54.6% having unassisted vaginal births (p64).


AIHW 2010 - click to enlarge
We do not yet have a 'Births in Victoria' report for 2010 or subsequent years.
 
This 2010 national report is from the Australian government's Mothers and Babies publications site.

I note:
  • In Table 3.18 (shown here), the number of babies born at home in Victoria has increased from 300 in 2009 (PDCU) to 567 in 2010. 
  • This is the actual place of birth, including those who planned to give birth in hospital, and the baby beat them to it, and those who intentionally gave birth unattended ('free birth')
  • The AIHW 2010 data does not report on home birth by intended place of birth in Victoria (Table 3.19, p29)
  • 2010 was the year that the two public hospital homebirth trials commenced at Sunshine and Casey.  The number of homebirths births through those hospitals was small (40)
  • 2010 was also the year that the federal government's maternity reform package was implemented, with midwives becoming eligible to provide Medicare-rebated antenatal and postnatal services from November 2010.



AIHW 2011 click to enlarge
 The 2011 national report from AIHW provides more information on home births in Victoria, as it includes the breakdown of those women who gave birth at home, having planned (intended to) give birth at home.

I note:
  • The number of planned homebirths in 2011, in Victoria,  was 432, accounting for 0.6% of the State's births.  
  • Looking back at Table 33 (above), the increase from 300 in 2009, 0.4%, is substantial.
  • Midwives in Victoria quickly accessed eligibility for Medicare, and promoted primary maternity care options for women.
  • The only place in Victoria where a midwife can practise privately is in the community, for planned homebirth.
  • No Victorian hospital has yet established processes whereby midwives can apply for clinical privileges and attend their clients in the hospital
  • Since 2010, a number of experienced midwives have resigned from mainstream Victorian hospital and birth centre employment and joined the ranks of midwives offering homebirth.
The following excerpt from AIHW 2011 provides interesting comment:
Homebirths 
In 2011, there were 1,267 women who gave birth at home, representing 0.4% of all women who gave birth. The highest proportions were in Victoria and Western Australia (0.8%) (Table 3.18). It is probable that not all homebirths are reported to the perinatal data collections.
The mean age of mothers who gave birth at home was 31.7 years (Table 3.49). The proportion of mothers younger than 20 was 1.3%, and the proportion aged 35 and over was 29.8%.
The proportion of mothers who gave birth at home who identified as being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin was 1.1%.
Most women who gave birth at home were living in Major cities (70.8%) (Table 3.49). Of mothers who gave birth at home, about one-quarter had their first baby (22.3%), and 77.4% were multiparous.
The predominant method of birth for 99.3% of women who gave birth at home was non-instrumental vaginal (Table 3.49). The presentation was vertex for 97.6% of women who gave birth at home.
Of babies born at home in 2011, 99.2% were liveborn. The mean birthweight of these liveborn babies was 3,614 grams (Table 3.49). The proportion of liveborn babies of low birthweight born at home was 1.6%, and the proportion of preterm babies born at home was 1.3%. (AIHW 2011, pages 65-66)

I note:
  • There were 10 babies of the 1,301 homebirths in 2011 recorded as fetal deaths.  These data do not provide detail as to how or why those deaths occurred.
  • The midwife is duty bound to promote the wellbeing and safety of the mother and baby in her care, above preference for place of birth, or other factors.


*The word 'confinements' is used in these reports, as a tally of the number of women who have given birth, rather than the number of births, which includes multiples.  Readers might like to suggest a better word!

No comments: